http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/010307Announcers.htm

"Blah blah blah, Prison Planet is not a legit source, blah blah blah."

WATCH THE VIDEOS. Someone fumbled the ball.

Could be a massive international conspiracy.

Or it could be a TV reporter standing against a blue screen.

Your choice.

But if it was a hoax, why do Google and Youtube keep on deleting it? Why did BBC mysteriously lose all copies of their broadcasts on 9/11? Why didn't BBC's official reponse, seen here even mention the possibility of a hoax?

The real hoax is that people have been led to believe in the accuracy of TV news.

That was deep, Mr. Ericsir.

MrEricSir wrote:

The real hoax is that people have been led to believe in the accuracy of TV news.

Which is my point.

The media is basically the Public Relations Department for the American Government.

If one makes enough untrue claims -- as many television "news" reporters do -- one such claim is eventually bound to prove correct in the future.

But how did TWO different stations make the same exact mistake? And is it also coincidence that the owner of the property, Larry Silveerstein, publicly ADMITTED that he ordered the demolition of Building 7:

http://www.911blogger.com/files/video/wtc7_pbs.WMV

His statement goes against the official story. And how come Google and Youtube decided to remove these clips from their sites 5 years AFTER they were put up?

Only I know the real answer.

^ you are my bitch

Hey, whose bitch can I be?

This is definitely an example of the law of fives.

What is, exactly?

twinklestar wrote:

^ you are my bitch

twinklestar wrote:

^ you are my bitch

*********************************************BRAINS**********************************

^ But I'm not speaking to Gash...

What the fuck do I have to do with any of this?